Being a Libertarian makes sense

September 5th, 2007 - Posted by Alan Howard

When I discovered I was a Libertarian, everything made sense to me.

“The Libertarian creed rests upon one central axiom: that no man or group of men may aggress against the person or property of anyone else. This may be called the “nonaggression axiom.” “Aggression” is defined as the initiation of the use or threat of physical violence against the person or property of anyone else. Aggression is therefore synonymous with invasion.”
- For a New Liberty: The Libertarian Manifesto, by Murray N. Rothbard

I’ve always had the belief that we should all have the right to do whatever we want, as long as it does not interfere with the rights of others to do whatever they want. Common law has generally been supportive of this philosophy, but it’s changed over the past few decades (centuries?).

I believe that people should be punished for their actions, not for their thoughts. I believe that people are innocent until proven guilty. I hate how this world has become something where people are guilty - all of them - until proven innocent.

I strongly believe in the Libertarian creed, and I’m so very frustrated by the actions of those who go against it. It appears to me that the elite follow their own creed, which seems to be:

“I have the right to do as I please, while doing my very best to ensure that the common people lose those same rights, thus allowing me to do even more of what I please.”

I am absolutely unable to comprehend why people would choose to create and support a society that takes away their freedom, their independence, and their rights. It stuns me that people would support the removal of their freedom. For freedom to be made illegal which, realistically, it is, is absurd.

I live in an absurd world.

So what about you? Do you support freedom, independence, and individual rights, or do you support the idea of freedom being illegal?

Share/Save/Bookmark

Entry Filed under: Freedom

2 Responses to “Being a Libertarian makes sense”

  1. AvatarGregory777
    1

    “Free speech includes not only the inoffensive but the irritating, the contentious, the eccentric, the heretical, the unwelcome and the provocative … Freedom only to speak inoffensively is not worth having.” — Lord Justice Sedley (UK) in
    Redmond-Bate v Director of Public Prosecutions, 23 July 1999 (q.v.).

    Reply to this comment.
  2. AvatarAlan Howard
    2

    Thanks Greg, that’s an excellent quote.

    Reply to this comment.

Leave a Comment

Required

Required, hidden

Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


Calendar

September 2007
M T W T F S S
« Aug   Oct »
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930

Recent Comments

    Alan Howard commented in Changes to the Great Aussie Adventure: I’m yet to work out the itinerary for the 2nd leg, but the 1st leg has the...

    Diarean commented in Changes to the Great Aussie Adventure: Even with your changed schedule it looks like a lot of driving with not much time...

    Alan Howard commented in Plans for 2009: Thanks for commenting Warwick. The only mod I’m considering at this point is the air intake for the...

    Warwick commented in Plans for 2009: Sounds like some great plans. You know my feelings on modifying a car. As a general rule, don’t do it!...

    Alan Howard commented in Sitting in a hotel room: I love traveling around the country - any country, really. Over xmas, leading up to the new year,...